Writing a short history of the serotonin literature is a daunting task, not because the history of the field is especially long, but because it is so complicated.
From humble beginnings as a nuisance that causes blood vessel contraction (Whitaker-Azmitia, 1999; open access), serotonin is now believed to be involved in everything from the circadian rhytm to locomotor gain to escape reflexes. Thanks to antidepressants and certain recreational drugs, the best known function of serotonin is probably its involvement in regulating mood, although the very concept of mood is difficult to pin down and the extent of serotonin's involvement remains controversial.
My personal area of interest is in the reward learning slice of the serotonin field. Ever since Schultz, Dayan, and Montague established a connection between the activity of dopamine neurons and reward prediction error in the late 1990s, serotonin researchers have been hoping for a similar watershed moment. Disappointingly, more than twenty five years later, this corner of the serotonin field still has not coalesced.
This page represents my attempt at a partial history of the reward learning part of the serotonin literature. Each dot represents a paper that I consider influential (even if I don't personally buy the main claims), arranged from left to right according to publication date. The size of the dot represents the average number of Google Scholar citations per year, which is not a great measure of impact but is the best I could come up with for a blog post, and lines connect dots that I think follow the same conceptual thread.
Hover your cursor over the labels below to highlight papers with similar ideas, then click on the dots for details about individual papers. Refresh the page to get back to this screen.
Influential ideas:
Influential idea: serotonin is involved in reward.
Influential idea: serotonin is involved in reward and is mildly reinforcing.
Influential ideas:
In this work, Zhong et al. measure the activity of DRN serotonin and VTA dopamine neurons as mice learned to associate a cue with a reward. Using fiber photometry to measure the bulk calcium activity of each population of neurons in freely-moving animals, they show that dopamine neurons initially exhibit a strong reward response that gradually transfers to the cue, as expected for a reward prediction error, while serotonin neurons exhibit a constant response to the reward itself and a pre-reward ramp that emerges gradually over the course of learning. These observations are very important for reinforcement learning-based theories of serotonergic function, because they suggest that serotonin neurons are involved in signalling expected future reward, rather than surprise or a prediction error.
The idea that serotonin neurons encode reward expectation rather than punishment or surprise contrasts with ideas in another branch of the serotonin literature. Possibly in an effort to reconcile these ideas, the authors also show that various sources of stress, including head restraint used routinely in the branch of the literature in question, dramatically suppress the responses of both serotonin and dopamine neurons. Exactly how this suppression could produce the appearance of a surprise or punishment code remains unclear.
Influential ideas:
Influential ideas:
Influential idea: serotonin neurons do not signal reward or punishment, they signal surprise to modulate learning.
Influential ideas:
Influential ideas:
Influential idea: serotonin modulates perceived immediacy of future rewards.
Influential idea: serotonin modulates perceived immediacy of future rewards.
Influential idea: serotonin neuron activity supports waiting for future reward.
Influential idea: waiting effects are not due to behavioural inhibition.
A series of optogenetic studies in rodents showed that activating serotonin neurons promotes passive waiting for delayed rewards. While these results have been interpreted as evidence that serotonin promotes patience or persistence, it could also be that dorsal raphe serotonin neurons simply decrease locomotor activity. In this work, Lottem et al. show that optogenetically activating serotonin neurons increases active reward seeking behaviour (nose poking), supporting an effect of serotonin on patience or persistence rather than locomotor inhibition.
Influential idea: serotonin may encode prior probability of reward.
Main idea: waiting effects might be due to behavioural inhibition?
Main idea: dorsal raphe neurons encode future reward, but it's complicated.
Influential idea: serotonin neurons are variable on a cellular level.
In computational and systems neuroscience, a neural system usually refers to a group of neurons with a common function in terms of behaviour, perception, or cognition (for example, the visual system). In other areas of neuroscience, the term system might refer to parts of the brain that express a common molecular marker but with diverse effects on behaviour, etc. (for example, the endocannabinoid system). This work represents an early example of an ongoing shift in the serotonin literature away from the idea that the dorsal raphe can be seen as a neural system in the computational and systems neuroscience sense.
In this work, the authors show that serotonin neurons in different parts of the dorsal raphe nucleus (and in the dorsal vs. median raphe nuclei) have different biochemical, morphological, and electrophysiological features. While there is overlap in the properties of neurons from different raphe sub-regions, this work marks an important step towards a "glass half heterogenous" view of the raphe.
Fernandez et al., 2016 (Open access)
Influential idea: serotonin neurons projecting to different regions have different properties.
Influential idea: there is no single serotonin system.
If there were a single part of the brain we could point to and call "the serotonin system" in a computational and systems neuroscience sense (see details related to Calizo et al., 2011), the dorsal raphe nucleus would be it. Here, Ren et al. make the case that not even the dorsal raphe fits the bill.
Much like the earlier work of Fernandez et al., Ren et al. show that dorsal raphe serotonin neurons projecting to the amygdala and frontal cortex are mostly not the same cells, are generally located in different parts of the raphe, and receive somewhat different inputs. Ren et al. take these results a step further by showing that these two groups of neurons display different responses to rewarding and aversive stimuli, and that optogeneticaly activating them has different behavioural effects.
The idea that serotonin neurons within the dorsal raphe are at least somewhat specialized is now impossible to ignore.
Influential idea: there is no single serotonin system and it's complicated.
Main ideas: